Desktop laser systems, fiber marking, and welding demos for growing production teams. Request a quote window

Comparing xTool Machines: The F1 Laser xTool, a CO2 Detour, and a TCO Lesson

An office administrator shares the story of comparing xTool machines for a fabrication shop, including the fiber laser definition, a laser co2 greensboro detour, and why total ownership cost beat the price tag.

Last November, my boss dropped two printed pages on my desk. “We need a laser engraver. Find one before the annual parts audit.” I’m the office administrator for a 34-person fabrication shop. I handle everything from shop towels to equipment leases—roughly $300,000 a year across eight vendors. I report to operations, and finance gets a quarterly look at everything I order. Over the years I’ve bought a lot of equipment, but a laser cutter was not one of them.

I did what any cautious buyer does: I started searching. Three weeks—or rather, closer to four counting quote back-and-forth—later, I’d gone from “which xTool?” to a spreadsheet that stopped me from making a $2,400 mistake. This is that story.

The Ask That Started It

The production manager wanted two things: serial-number tags on stainless steel fixtures, and small acrylic warning panels. The tags were the bottleneck. We were outsourcing them at $4.50 each with a one- to two-week lead time. If we made them in-house, operations estimated we’d save $3,000 a year and speed up final assembly. Finance wanted proof before committing.

So I searched “laser co2 greensboro” first, hoping a local dealer could show me something in person. Instead, I got dermatology pages about a “co2 laser skin resurfacing procedure.” At first I thought the algorithm had glitched. It hadn’t. A CO2 laser is an energy source, not an application. The same wavelength used for medical resurfacing is also used in industrial cutters, but the systems are entirely different. I will say that as a buyer, this was the moment I realized I needed to separate “laser types” from “laser uses.”

Fiber vs CO2: The Five-Minute Version

I’m not a laser engineer, so I can’t speak to beam profiles or spot-size physics. What I can tell you from a purchasing perspective is what each type is usually chosen for. The simplest fiber laser definition I can give: a laser in which the gain medium is an optical fiber doped with rare-earth elements, usually ytterbium. The light is pumped into the fiber and delivered through a fiber optic cable. Fiber lasers are good at marking and engraving bare metals and some plastics. They have no gas tank to refill, which mattered to me because I handle consumable stock.

CO2 lasers use a gas mixture as the gain medium and generate a longer infrared wavelength. They’re excellent for wood, acrylic, leather, cardboard, and other organics. Bare metal is not their strong suit unless it has a coating or marking compound. That last sentence is the one that kept me out of trouble.

Compare xTool Machines: What I Actually Compared

Once I had the basics, I typed “compare xTool machines” and tried to be systematic. I knew xTool as a brand my makerspace friend used, but I wasn’t going to recommend a purchase based on enthusiasm. Per FTC guidelines (ftc.gov), advertising claims have to be truthful and substantiated. I took that as my own rule: if the claim mattered, I would verify it.

The candidate list shrank to three xTool machines. The S1 is a diode laser with a decent work area for wood and acrylic; it’s also the easiest on the budget. The P2 is a CO2 machine that handles larger organic-material jobs and cuts thicker acrylic with clean edges. The F1 laser xTool is the hybrid: a small desktop unit with both a diode laser and an infrared laser for metal marking. The Metalfab fiber machine was faster for production metal work, but it was bigger and priced for a shop that runs laser work every shift. We don’t.

Then I added total-cost columns: unit price, shipping, setup time, consumables, maintenance, and the cost per part if we had to outsource anyway. The S1 looked great at first. But it couldn’t mark bare stainless steel reliably. The P2 looked versatile. But for our metal tags, it would need a marking compound and an extra process step. The F1 was not the lowest upfront price, but it directly removed the outsourcing expense for tags and handled the acrylic panels we actually had.

The Twist: A Great Deal That Wasn’t

A used CO2 dealer outside Greensboro quoted me $2,400 for a machine. After a $900 delivery and setup charge, that’s $3,300. The xTool F1 bundle—with rotary attachment and some extras—came to roughly $1,800 in my January 2025 quote. Prices as of that quote; verify current rates before you buy.

The used CO2 machine would cut acrylic beautifully. During the demo, it made a clean edge on half-inch acrylic without trouble. Then I asked to run one stainless tag. The salesman said it would need a marking spray. The spray was $180 a bottle, and the finish was okay but not consistent on the thin tags. I looked at the spreadsheet and realized the “deal” bought us a machine for the half of the job we didn’t need help with.

The F1 wasn’t perfect either. Its smaller work area meant more material handling. But our acrylic panels were small enough. The real cost was labor, not cut speed.

What This Taught Me About Purchasing

Looking back, I should have asked about specific materials before searching “laser co2 greensboro.” At the time, I thought “engraver” was one category. It isn’t. If we’d bought the CO2, we’d still be paying outsourcing costs on tags, plus the spray, plus the extra step. The lower quote would have become the higher total cost.

Now I run every equipment candidate with the same checklist. I do not mean to say the cheapest option is always wrong. What I mean is this: a machine’s true cost includes the tasks it leaves to outsourcing. If you’re comparing xTool machines, don’t open the shopping page first. Start with materials, volume, operator skill, and every cost that remains after the machine lands. Verify claims with a test. Then compare.

Share on LinkedIn Email this note
Jane Smith

Jane Smith

I’m Jane Smith, a senior content writer with over 15 years of experience in the packaging and printing industry. I specialize in writing about the latest trends, technologies, and best practices in packaging design, sustainability, and printing techniques. My goal is to help businesses understand complex printing processes and design solutions that enhance both product packaging and brand visibility.

Leave a technical question